This bibliography on crime, law enforcement, and justice was prepared as a community history resource by staff of the former King County Office of Cultural Resources, now 4Culture King County Cultural Development Authority. It was last revised in August This study does not include most reference material relating to politics, general government and legislative activity. A number of items relating to judicial activity and lawsuits is included.
When he looks to select the next Attorney General of the United States, or the next Supreme Court justice, or even just the lower federal courts, President-elect Barack Obama will see plenty of smart options and certainly many opportunities to continue his brand of "new" politics.
Let's look first at the Attorney General position. It is imperative that Obama select someone who will continue to Judge kollar reigns s upreme essay and rebuild the Justice Department in the wake of Alberto Gonzales' disastrous reign.
The candidate must restore professionalism and nonpartisanship within the Department and also continue to adapt to the evolving legal war on terror.
One obvious choice for the position is Eric Holder, a former Justice Department official in the Clinton Administration who has kept a suitably low profile in Washington during the Democrats' exile from the White House.
Holder is a Democrat, but it will be hard for Republicans to tag him as a crony of the Left. He knows the ropes at Justice, has some experience in dealing with terror law and domestic crime which is upand has the intelligence and demeanor to generate confidence in the halls of Congress.
If Obama were to look beyond his own party, he could select for Justice either James B. Comey or Patrick J. Fitzgerald, two Republicans who have left deep marks in the law during their time in government. Comey was Deputy Attorney General to John Ashcroft during the Bush Administration and showed great integrity during one of the most significant scandals in Justice Department history.
It was Comey, sitting in for an ailing Ashcroft, who refused under pressure to certify the White House's controversial and, at the time, arguably illegal "domestic surveillance" operation.
Fitzgerald, too, showed great political courage and legal acumen when he was named special prosecutor in the CIA leak case. A masterful trial lawyer and dogged personality, Fitzgerald successfully prosecuted I.
His nomination for the AG position clearly would send a "bipartisan" message to the Congress and the courts. He has the talent to reach a new level in government and Obama could do worse than giving him a chance.
Now let's look to the Supreme Court. Right now, seven of the nine Justices were appointed by Republicans; the oldest members are the most liberal and the youngest are the most conservative.
So Obama should have an opportunity to appoint several new Justices. First, forget any talk of big-time Washington lawyer Robert Barnett getting the nod. But that's not to say that he can't or won't select a candidate who is not currently an active judge.
Indeed, the Supreme Court clearly could use justice who doesn't come from a federal appeals court; someone with a background like Sandra Day O'Connor, who spent some time as a state legislator in Arizona before becoming a state court judge and then the first female Justice in history.
She's brilliant, got some experience in government during the Clinton Administration, and doesn't appear to raise the hair on the backs of the necks of conservative. Oh, and not incidentally, she clerked for the late Justice Thurgood Marshall, the first black Justice.
She's 48, which means she's just a tick older that Obama himself. Another unconventional candidate would be Hillary Rodham Clinton. She has a law background and was famously good in her youth as counsel for the Democrats during the Watergate investigation. If she doesn't want to continue as one voice in in the Senate, or if she no longer has the will to run init's not hard to see a scenario where she parks herself at the Supreme Court.
Obama certainly will offer her some sort of position within his Administration - as payback for her wonderful soldier-like work during the campaign.
Why not a spot on the Court?
When it comes to trial court vacancies, Obama will have an opportunity over the next few years to begin to rebalance the federal judiciary after 20 of 28 years of Republican rule. Although it is often difficult to label a federal trial judge as "liberal" or "conservative," one recent report suggested that the courts have about a balance now in favor of conservative jurists.
That balance is sure to change during the Obama Administration. But just how far and how quickly is an open question. Ironically, it is here, with the question of judicial appointments, where Sen. John McCain can perhaps best help his former rival.An Essayon Racism words 4 Affirmative action policies were often criticized as reverse discrimination by non blacks whom the policies affect U.S.
Supreme Court has generally supported affirmative action policies, though there have been a few reversals. In December , A federal judge in California upheld a temporary ban on.
When he looks to select the next Attorney General of the United States, or the next Supreme Court justice, or even just the lower federal courts, President-elect Barack Obama will see plenty of. Following this Introduction, Part I of this Essay provides an overview of the three competing theories of corporate governance as indicated above.
In addition, I include a brief discussion of managerialism because I believe, along with many others, that there are still many corporations where the CEO reigns supreme. On Wednesday, April 25, , Judge Charles J. Kollar, of North Brunswick Municipal Court, was confronted with a variety of motor vehicle related cases.
From reckless driving to driving without a registration and everything in between, some of the case. Oct 18, · Judge James Pohl, following the government's lead, has so far continued that tradition in this case.
"Give me a concrete example, and I'll tell you what applies," he said Thursday morning. Does parliamentary sovereignty still reign supreme? If parliament is sovereign, why can the UK supreme court ignore the European Convention on Human Rights?
Adam Wagner on .